Option right now
It is, but how often are you really playing games that require maxed-out ray tracing? AMD’s performance-per-dollar is better overall, especially at 1440p and 4K.Silas wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2025 10:41 pm But isn’t NVIDIA better for ray tracing and DLSS? I mean, DLSS 3.0 looks like magic for boosting frame rates without losing quality.
Also, if you’re into content creation, NVIDIA still has the edge. Their software ecosystem—like Studio Drivers and better support for programs like Blender and Adobe—makes a big difference.Kai wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2025 10:42 pmIt is, but how often are you really playing games that require maxed-out ray tracing? AMD’s performance-per-dollar is better overall, especially at 1440p and 4K.Silas wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2025 10:41 pm But isn’t NVIDIA better for ray tracing and DLSS? I mean, DLSS 3.0 looks like magic for boosting frame rates without losing quality.
Fair, but let’s not forget that AMD cards use less power. The RX 6800 XT is a great mid-range option that runs cool and still crushes at 1440p.Josiah wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2025 10:42 pmAlso, if you’re into content creation, NVIDIA still has the edge. Their software ecosystem—like Studio Drivers and better support for programs like Blender and Adobe—makes a big difference.Kai wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2025 10:42 pmIt is, but how often are you really playing games that require maxed-out ray tracing? AMD’s performance-per-dollar is better overall, especially at 1440p and 4K.Silas wrote: Mon Jan 06, 2025 10:41 pm But isn’t NVIDIA better for ray tracing and DLSS? I mean, DLSS 3.0 looks like magic for boosting frame rates without losing quality.
NVIDIA is still the better choice for VR. Their drivers and optimizations work better with most VR setups. AMD is catching up, but NVIDIA is the safer bet for now.